May 2025
EBIC has released a joint position paper urging the European Commission to restore normal REACH (Regulation (EC) 1907/2006) requirements for substances used in EU fertilising products. The call comes amid growing concerns that the current “REACH+” approach imposes disproportionate burdens on innovation and supply chains without delivering measurable safety benefits.
This joint paper has been released alongside 11 co-signatories: The Association des Producteurs Européens de Potasse (APEP); European Consortium of the Organic-Based Fertiliser (ECOFI), ESPP; – the European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform; Fertilizers Europe; Growing Media Europe, AEFA; Spanish Agricultural Nutrients Manufacturers Association; The Union of Fertilisation Industries (UNIFA); Artemis, Federchimica Assofertilizzanti – National Association of Fertilizer Manufacturers; Hellenic Fertilizers’ Association; and Afaïa.
REACH+, is the term given to the stricter application of the REACH Regulation within the Fertilising Products Regulation (FPR, EU 2019/1009), which requires substances produced in volumes under 10 tonnes per year to meet the same data and registration demands as those produced at industrial scale. These heightened requirements have been applied without a prior impact assessment or evidence of increased safety, the paper argues.
“Instead of encouraging innovation, these disproportionate requirements are deterring it—especially for substances used in very small quantities,” said Hélène Collignon, EBIC Consultant. “Many of these inputs are already approved for use in food or feed. Requiring additional chemical safety reporting for fertilising products only increases costs and complexity without any corresponding benefit.”
The paper outlines three central concerns:
These issues disproportionately affect small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and slow the adoption of innovative products like biostimulants which can help support farmers remain competitive and sustainable.
EBIC’s paper proposes several practical revisions:
These measures, EBIC says, would uphold high safety and environmental standards while restoring legal certainty and economic viability for producers.
“These regulatory requirements undermine the EU’s goals for competitiveness, circularity, and sustainability. We, alongside other industry bodies, urge the Commission to align the Fertilising Products Regulation with the principles of Better Regulation and re-enable innovation.”
The position paper includes economic impact examples and regulatory comparisons to reinforce its case. The message in this paper is reinforced in EBIC’s new position paper calling for simplification in EU regulation, in which it stresses that the EU risks falling behind other global regions with more agile regulatory frameworks.
Let’s work together to ensure EU Fertilising product rules are proportionate, practical, and innovation-friendly. We invite you to:
If you have any questions about this article, please contact Hélène on helene@prospero.ag.